Friday, September 14, 2007
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Ignorance at the Eidtorial level is No Excuse
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:45 AM
2
comments
Nose Counting, Nose Picking: What's the Difference?
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:35 AM
0
comments
The Quiet Crimes of the Olympics
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:27 AM
2
comments
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Victor Channels the Dell-Vikings!
Watching the kids this week, it occurred to me that something has been lost. Something our generation treasured. Simply, it was listening to music together.
I watched the kids walk by with their Ipods and other PLDs (personal listening devices) plugged into their ears. Alone in the sound.
Kids listen to music while alone today. Sure, they hear music as a group when 50,000 of them go to a concert, but in truth, in those situations, they hear neither the music nor one another.
We listened to music together. We nattered about it. The record bar, as it was called, was a small corner of a department store, where we could gather as a pubescent group and listen to a record, at no charge, while practicing flirting. Hamburger joints had juke boxes and we would wait, six or more in a group, until some guy fed a quarter for four songs and then we would call out requests. Remember the chant ( Aw c'mon, play D5). We would ride, six of us, in a friend's car ( 52 Studebaker) and a song would come on the radio. Somebody would shout. " I like this song, turn it up!" The driver would say " hey man, you're blowing my speaker! ( Speaker, as in singular, there were no plural speakers in 52 Studs). Or sometimes, in teenage exuberance, we would dole out 85 cents ( a fortune) for a new 45 and call our our friends to come over and listen to our new Ricky Nelson record. We played it 17 times. In the basement. Our parents would finally yell "Turn down that noise!"
That's all gone. Today, music and earwax are all part of the same experience for a 14 year old. Maybe it doesn't matter. But I'm glad I was there then.
Posted by
David Berner
at
6:24 PM
3
comments
Some Small Hope for Addicts
Posted by
David Berner
at
9:11 AM
0
comments
One from Column A, please
Posted by
David Berner
at
9:07 AM
1 comments
The Veils of Politics
Posted by
David Berner
at
9:00 AM
0
comments
Tony Bennett and Stevie Wonder - For Once in my life live
Tonight you can see a Tony Bennett special biography on PBS TV. It will air here from 6-7:30 on the Detroit station (Cable 43) and from 9-10:30 on KCTS 9 (Cable 27)
Here is my all-tome favorite balladeer with the incomparable Stevie Wonder.
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:54 AM
0
comments
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Another Cheated Cambie Line Business Speaks Out
I appreciate the apparent complexity of the problem of equitable and realistic compensation. However, not to deal with the topic at all sets an unacceptable precedent that it is ok to push through a public project without regards to private rights to make a living and provide for their families. The businesses in Cambie village, in many cases, have their life savings invested in their businesses and are the only means they have to provide for themselves and their families. That means to survive has been stripped away without regard by the very government bodies they have been paying taxes to. The Cambie merchants are not asking for handouts, they are simply asking for moral and ethical behaviour and the right to continue to be contributors to our economy, through their businesses.
A public project managed with integrity would include, full disclosure of the methodology and impact of the project; communication with the merchants regarding how they are being affected by it and what they need to get through this crisis; acknowledgement and accountability for damages created; and responsibility to compensate for those damages. These principles apply to private construction projects and are enforced by law. Public projects should not be exempt from our most fundamental of laws - being accountable to others for foreseeable damages caused by actions taken.
The management of the Canada Line project is riddled with inconsistency of word and action. It appears that the parties that back the project haven’t done their due diligence re: the cost of the project, which includes the cost of the impact of those in the area, as it relates to the chosen construction methodology. Whether the damages are intentional or unintentional, they should be required to compensate as they are the only ones that have the power to create or prevent financial damages to others.
The construction methods and corresponding impact on the Cambie businesses was grossly misrepresented and the construction schedules change almost daily, leaving the average business person incapable of planning for and managing losses. These losses are simply a cost of construction that should have been allowed for and factored into the funding equation. To allow public projects to go forward without consideration for impact is socially irresponsible. It is our duty to stand up and ensure that this construction model is not repeated anywhere else in Canada.
There is a simple remedy for determining and compensating for losses created by the project. Look at earnings prior to construction and earnings during the construction, the difference is the extent of the business losses created by the project. This could be easily verified by requiring financial statements audited by certified accountants. This formula could be restricted to projects over a specific period of time (say three months or longer), causing unsustainable financial damages that endanger the continued existence of the business.
For those that have left the area, the losses could be limited to the time spent in the area during construction. For those just arrived, they entered into commitments with full knowledge of the impact and should have factored those into their financial plans, therefore not being eligible for compensation. The fact that so many new businesses have entered the area should be testimonial to the “fire sale” nature of the businesses that have been replaced. It should not be considered evidence of healthy commerce in the area.
Asking for responsibility for damages created in the form of compensation is the only action consistent with our democratic political system and our legal justice systems as they are currently defined. To sanction the expropriation of livelihood by the government at will, “for the public good”, is a very dangerous precedent to set.
Dale DubberleyPresident/ Thai Away Enterprises Inc.
Posted by
David Berner
at
9:19 PM
1 comments
Gateway Secrecy
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:45 AM
1 comments
Kids...Whatsamatter with kids today?
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:36 AM
3
comments
"Jane Doe" is Out
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:31 AM
0
comments
Great New Movie - "THIS IS ENGLAND"
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:07 AM
0
comments
Monday, September 10, 2007
City Gall
Posted by
David Berner
at
9:21 AM
0
comments
The Many Reasons & Seasons of Stevie Wonder(ful)
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:57 AM
0
comments
Don't Take Technology for Granted. So much of Today's World is Truly Astonishing
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:44 AM
0
comments
From Our Good Friend Bill
Posted by
David Berner
at
8:41 AM
0
comments
Sunday, September 9, 2007
Are We All Teenage Girls?
Posted by
David Berner
at
11:56 AM
4
comments







