Thursday, February 23, 2012
CHILDREN AND YOUTH GET SLIM PICKINGS IN BUDGET 2012
People looking for investments in BC’s children and youth were sorely disappointed with BC’s new budget released on February 21st. First Call: BC Child and Youth Advocacy Coalition was looking for the budget to recognize the importance of supporting families raising children, particularly those who are struggling to get by on a low income. The Coalition was also hoping that the budget would address some of the urgent issues affecting the lives of the most vulnerable child and youth populations, and to tackle BC’s growing inequality. However, these are clearly not the priorities reflected in the revenue generation and spending choices of this year’s provincial budget.
Some highlights of First Call’s concerns about the budget include:
· The continued neglect of the need for additional funding for the Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) to reduce the caseloads of child protection social workers and adequately support children in the foster care system. A flat-lined budget and rising costs means this ministry will have to make cuts.
· No progress on solving the child care crisis affecting families with young children. No relief from high fees, insufficient spaces and low wages for child care workers. No plans for increasing access to quality early childhood care and learning for preschoolers. Alarmingly, in the Ministry of Education service plan, government’s target for the percentage of children who enter kindergarten developmentally ready to learn has been lowered from the previous 85% by 2015 to 75% by that date. Current data shows we are only at 70%, meaning almost 1 in 3 BC children enter school developmentally vulnerable.
· The increase in regressive taxes like MSP premiums will hit modest income working families hardest, making it even less likely they will have the cash to pay for fitness or arts programs for their children in order to earn the new $25 tax credit. Research on the use of this type of tax credit at the federal level reveals that it is primarily used by more affluent families, and offers little benefit for lower income families.
· Children in families facing hunger and housing insecurity due to already inadequate income assistance rates will be hungrier and in greater danger of becoming homeless as the cost of food and housing continues to rise while rates are frozen.
· No relief for post-secondary students facing high tuition fees and high interest rates on their student loans when they graduate, despite the recommendations from the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services to lower interest rates and restore a needs-based grant program.
· The cumulative funding deficit in public education continues to grow with this budget, depriving students with extra challenges of the supports they need while school boards struggle to decide what to cut even to pay their share of the MSP premium increases.
“The Finance Minister talks of fiscal prudence, but this budget’s failure to invest in the well-being of all children and youth will cost us dearly as inequities grow bigger and more children lack the supports they need to reach their full potential,” said Adrienne Montani, First Call’s Provincial Coordinator. “It’s a false economy to ignore the costs of undermining children’s healthy development through maintaining a high poverty rate and withholding needed support.”
- 30 -
For interviews please contact:
Adrienne Montani, Provincial Coordinator, First Call: BC Child and Youth Advocacy Coalition
Saturday, February 18, 2012
STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND
Chronic alcoholics get free booze in Vancouver
Early results promising: Better health and behaviour
It's all in the headline and the sub-header. You don't really even have to read the article on page 3.
There's the professional photo of the sincere and completely deranged, deluded "helper," measuring out this hour's poison for her "clients."
She believes that she is doing something.
Hahahahaha...
I laugh to stop myself from crying so early in the day.
On Wednesday, I spent a few hours visiting one of the houses run by Turning Point, a residential treatment centre, operating in Vancouver and in Richmond for 30 years now. Addicts of every kind are arriving every day and leaving a month or so later clean and sober citizens. Brenda Plant and her team are tireless, knowledgeable and committed.
Cost?
$25,000/bed per year.
On Tuesdays, I do a little work each week on Bowen Island at a private clinic, The Orchard, where - guess what - addicts if every kind arrive and leave a while later clean and sober. Lorinda Strang and her staff are relentless and focused and funny and inspired.
Regularly, I am in touch with dozens of similar agencies, large and small, each doing beautiful human work aimed at helping people escape the nightmares, indignities and suffering of addictions.
Last night, I spoke for half an hour with a wonderful woman in Nanaimo - France Tellier of the John Howard Society - who has been building residential community treatment facilities for ages.
You will rarely hear or read about these good people.
But Little Miss Booze Dispenser is pictured on page 3, and, in the Courier you can read about the increase in overdoses at Insite. Of course, the lunatics who run this obscenity - completely missing or obscuring the point as usual - will tell you that they are saving lives.
Let's just say it out loud, together.
THE WORLD IS COMPLETELY MAD.
Life is upside down.
It's Cheshire Cat time.
The program of free Ford autos for car thieves starts next Thursday.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
WORST DRUG STORY EVER
Today, the Vancouver Sun is chock-full of stories about the shortfall of funding for senior's health and housing concerns.
In recent weeks, similar stories have been presented about overcrowded ER facilities in our largest regional hospitals.
We continue to have the worst record in the country in dealing with child poverty.
AND YET...
And yet, only the fearless Mark Hasiuk of the Vancouver Courier has written in plain English the obscenity of funding that continues to flown into a rogue group whose basic platform is this:
"We are drug addicts and we like to be drug addicts and we have the right to be drug addicts and you the taxpayer should pay us to be drug addicts."
This group never explains how its "members" get the money to shoot heroin or use other illegal substances.
But hey - when the Provincial government si giving you $250,000/year and the City of Vancouver is giving you $20,000/year, why worry?
Please read Mark's article below and then email your MLA and demand that this money be returned and that this kind of funding is never repeated.
Vancouver pro-drug lobby doesn’t deserve taxpayer dollars
VANDU gets $250,000 from province, $20,000 from city hall
Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
That’s how much Vancouver Coastal Health, your public health authority, gave VANDU, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, last year. This year, according to VCH officials, VANDU will receive another $250,000 from taxpayers, continuing a provincial funding scheme established in 1999.
Most Vancouverites don’t know VANDU. Headquartered in a brick building at 380 East Hastings in the Downtown Eastside, it’s a non-profit hangout conforming to neighbourhood drug culture. Folks gather outside on the sidewalk and inside the lobby. Traffic seems to have increased since December when VANDU began distributing free crack pipes to addicts, part of a VCH crack pipe giveaway. But mainly, thanks to longtime leader Ann Livingston, VANDU exists for activism.
Wherever police move against drugs, VANDU is there. Whenever Insite stages a street-level show of support, VANDU, which according to the city’s website offers cash “stipends” for "VANDU work," shows up. Livingston and company crash city hall, chiding council for police sins like the ticketing of illegal street vendors. Last week, following a four-year legal battle, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a complaint from VANDU and the Pivot Legal Society who claimed the Downtown Ambassadors, a private security firm, discriminated against the homeless. Not even the tribunal, which relies on frivolous cases and flimsy evidence, could justify VANDU’s complaints.
Under the radar, VANDU provides “public speakers” and “research and consultation” to anyone interested in the VANDU point of view. Before booking a VANDU expert, you must call for a “free consultation.” Any additional fees are unknown. Livingston did not return calls for this column. But in 2009, she told the Courier that VANDU employs three paid staff members who help organize group meetings and “counselling” sessions at 380 East Hastings.
Of course, counselling is subjective, depending largely on the goal. According to VANDU’s “manifesto for a Drug User Liberation Movement” available on its website, folks have the “right to obtain, prepare, and ingest drugs, and to be intoxicated on drugs.” It continues: “We might take drugs to deal with psychological trauma or physical pain, or for pleasure or fun… our drug use is a response to our experiences of poverty, inequality, colonization, forced migration, workplace injury and inadequate access to pain relief.”
This is the VANDU gospel. Enablement on steroids. Victimization, stamped and validated. Music to the ears of the addict who organizes life around shunned responsibility. Every school of addiction treatment recognizes past trauma and the desire to self-medicate. That’s what addiction is. While sober minds can debate drug policy and decriminalization, the realities of addiction remain constant. Addicts want more. In response, VANDU celebrates drug abuse. Its 1,089-word manifesto excludes the words “addiction” and “addict,” calling drug abusers “oppressed people.”
Here’s why. According to the VANDU website, only “a person who has formerly, or is presently using illicit drugs” can become a voting member of the organization. To be clear. Addicts are people. Our friends, our family, our brothers and sisters. They deserve love and respect among, what Christ called, the “weary and burdened.” But until they recover, addicts place their addictions first. Any edict born from a group of addicts, under the influence of radical ideologues, will promote more enablement, more denial. Yet in a neighbourhood steeped in addiction, where treatment and prevention remains an afterthought, our provincial government funds this madness.
Why? Where’s the benefit? VANDU’s message helps fuel drug culture in the Downtown Eastside and a never-ending bill of housing, welfare, medical, policing and court costs.
But that’s not all. In addition to cash from Victoria, VANDU received $20,000 from city hall last year and will receive another $20,000 in 2012. Moreover, since 2006, VANDU headquarters has operated without a development permit. Back in 2009, Livingston said she was “negotiating” with the city. Apparently, negotiations have stalled.
VANDU is a cancer in a neighbourhood struggling to breathe. Its public funding is obscene. No government, at any level, has received a mandate from voters to prop up a pro-dope lobby.
mhasiuk@vancourier.com
Twitter: @MarkHasiuk
That’s how much Vancouver Coastal Health, your public health authority, gave VANDU, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, last year. This year, according to VCH officials, VANDU will receive another $250,000 from taxpayers, continuing a provincial funding scheme established in 1999.
Most Vancouverites don’t know VANDU. Headquartered in a brick building at 380 East Hastings in the Downtown Eastside, it’s a non-profit hangout conforming to neighbourhood drug culture. Folks gather outside on the sidewalk and inside the lobby. Traffic seems to have increased since December when VANDU began distributing free crack pipes to addicts, part of a VCH crack pipe giveaway. But mainly, thanks to longtime leader Ann Livingston, VANDU exists for activism.
Wherever police move against drugs, VANDU is there. Whenever Insite stages a street-level show of support, VANDU, which according to the city’s website offers cash “stipends” for "VANDU work," shows up. Livingston and company crash city hall, chiding council for police sins like the ticketing of illegal street vendors. Last week, following a four-year legal battle, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a complaint from VANDU and the Pivot Legal Society who claimed the Downtown Ambassadors, a private security firm, discriminated against the homeless. Not even the tribunal, which relies on frivolous cases and flimsy evidence, could justify VANDU’s complaints.
Under the radar, VANDU provides “public speakers” and “research and consultation” to anyone interested in the VANDU point of view. Before booking a VANDU expert, you must call for a “free consultation.” Any additional fees are unknown. Livingston did not return calls for this column. But in 2009, she told the Courier that VANDU employs three paid staff members who help organize group meetings and “counselling” sessions at 380 East Hastings.
Of course, counselling is subjective, depending largely on the goal. According to VANDU’s “manifesto for a Drug User Liberation Movement” available on its website, folks have the “right to obtain, prepare, and ingest drugs, and to be intoxicated on drugs.” It continues: “We might take drugs to deal with psychological trauma or physical pain, or for pleasure or fun… our drug use is a response to our experiences of poverty, inequality, colonization, forced migration, workplace injury and inadequate access to pain relief.”
This is the VANDU gospel. Enablement on steroids. Victimization, stamped and validated. Music to the ears of the addict who organizes life around shunned responsibility. Every school of addiction treatment recognizes past trauma and the desire to self-medicate. That’s what addiction is. While sober minds can debate drug policy and decriminalization, the realities of addiction remain constant. Addicts want more. In response, VANDU celebrates drug abuse. Its 1,089-word manifesto excludes the words “addiction” and “addict,” calling drug abusers “oppressed people.”
Here’s why. According to the VANDU website, only “a person who has formerly, or is presently using illicit drugs” can become a voting member of the organization. To be clear. Addicts are people. Our friends, our family, our brothers and sisters. They deserve love and respect among, what Christ called, the “weary and burdened.” But until they recover, addicts place their addictions first. Any edict born from a group of addicts, under the influence of radical ideologues, will promote more enablement, more denial. Yet in a neighbourhood steeped in addiction, where treatment and prevention remains an afterthought, our provincial government funds this madness.
Why? Where’s the benefit? VANDU’s message helps fuel drug culture in the Downtown Eastside and a never-ending bill of housing, welfare, medical, policing and court costs.
But that’s not all. In addition to cash from Victoria, VANDU received $20,000 from city hall last year and will receive another $20,000 in 2012. Moreover, since 2006, VANDU headquarters has operated without a development permit. Back in 2009, Livingston said she was “negotiating” with the city. Apparently, negotiations have stalled.
VANDU is a cancer in a neighbourhood struggling to breathe. Its public funding is obscene. No government, at any level, has received a mandate from voters to prop up a pro-dope lobby.
mhasiuk@vancourier.com
Twitter: @MarkHasiuk
© Copyright (c) Vancouver Courier
LIFE IS COMPLICATED
Here are three people well known to the public and how I feel about them.
Bill O'Reilly - A television host whom I generally can't stand and never watch.
Whitney Houston - A talented singer and drug abuser who died at the age of 48. I was never a particular fan, I hated some of her biggest hits, and I was disgusted that she threww away the gifts she had been given.
Tony Bennett - The greatest saloon singer of all time and one of my personal heroes.
YET...
Watch the video below.
I am disappointed by Tony's mistaken message on legalizing drugs.
I am in complete agreement with O'Reilly on the same subject and on the real tragedy of Ms. Houston's death.
Life is complicated.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Sunday, February 5, 2012
OPEN LETTER TO 2 ERRANT MP's
Dear Randall Garrison, NDP MP for Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca and Peter Stoffer, NDP MP for Sackville-Eastern Shore,
Gentlemen,
What are your values?
The recent story in the national press that you both are lobbying to convince the government that golf games are a valid business expense, worthy of a 50-per-cent tax deduction, indicates clearly it is time for a serious gut check.
Your All Party Golf Caucus is an obscenity.
I had to check the date on the paper to make sure this wasn't April 1st.
Grace MacInnis was a valued friend. I have voted NDP consistently for many years. Not because I ever expected to see an NDP government ever replace either of the two Natural Ruling Parties. Rather, I have been encouraged that there were some in Canadian public life who were still remembering the little guy and the average person and the worker, as distinct from the owner.
Now, you two, wearing NDP colors, emerge from the sludge and try to convince us that playing golf is worthy of a tax deduction.
And what's more amazing? It takes a Conservative Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, to tell you where to stuff this very bad idea.
A tale right out of Alice in Wonderland.
And so, dear NDP MP's...what about my tennis racquets? My jogging shoes? The kids' soccer and hockey equipment? The skis, the hoops, the Speedos?
Also worthy tax write-offs?
Shame on you both. Shake your heads. Read the history of your own party.
Then, if you still in the light of day want to pursue this selfish, thoughtless idiocy, please cross the floor and join one of the other teams.
Not that they'd have you.
TO THE READER:
Here are the email addresses for these two scoundrels:
randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca
Saturday, February 4, 2012
KEEP THESE OUT
Religion is a private affair.
Yours, mine and the strange guy sitting right behind the bus driver.
Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, a rabbit's foot, tigers - worship whom or what you choose or choose not.
But in a democratic society, do any or all or none of that in your heart or in your home or in your synagogue, cathedral, mosque, shanty or bomb shelter.
We human critters all long to find some grand explanation for the Great Unknowable Mysteries.
Fine.
Just don't tell me about it.
Don't lecture or proselytize or preach at me.
It's really unbearable and it's against the grain.
Which brings us to the lovely story in today's Vancouver Sun about Evangelicals roaming the halls of local schools.
Make no mistake.
These good folk are exactly that. They seem kind and beneficent. They are involved with kids in sports and drama projects.
But they have one singular and completely inappropriate purpose - to persuade children of an especially vulnerable age that their chosen religious path is the One and Only, etc.
What baffles me about this story is how school and school board administrators allow this to continue.
Perhaps you can explain.
And if you are tragically lacking in understanding, you may think that I am saying something dreadful and blasphemous about Christianity or any other religious belief system.
I am not.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
UPDATE
Snow in Vancouver!
Chilled Vancouver commuters faced their second day of winter hell today, as an additional ¼ centimetre of the peculiar white stuff fell, bringing the lower mainland to its knees and causing millions of dollars worth of damage to the marijuana crops. Scientists suspect that the substance is some form of frozen water particles and experts from Saskatchewan are being flown in. With temperatures dipping to the almost but not quite near zero mark, Vancouverites were warned to double insulate their lattes before venturing out.
Vancouver police recommended that people stay inside except for emergencies, such as running out of espresso or biscotti to see them through Vancouver 's most terrible storm to date. The local Canadian Tire reported that they had completely sold out of fur-lined sandals.
Drivers were cautioned to put their convertible tops up, and several have been shocked to learn that their SUV's actually have four wheel drive, although most have no idea how to use it.
Weary commuters faced soggy sushi, and the threat of frozen breast implants. Although Dr. John Blatherwick, of the Coastal Health Authority reassured everyone that most breast implants were perfectly safe to 25 below, down-filled bras are flying off the shelves at Mountain Equipment Co-op.
"The government has to do something," snarled an angry Trevor Warburton. "I didn't pay $850,000 for my one bedroom condo so I could sit around and be treated like someone from Toronto.
Monday, January 23, 2012
SUPERB COMMENTARY
| ||||
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "DRUNK PSYCHIATRY":
Most people don't understand that psychiatry is not based on science but on theories that are never proven in any accepted scientific manner. Their theories cannot be proven in any literal way. It's all just in their heads. Seriously.
And in our twisted system of law (it's a 'lawyer system', not a legal system), psychiatrists are paid obscene sums to opine on anything without a single shred of evidence except "their opinion". They are hired guns for the law courts, and for the pharmaceutical companies, virtually all of them.
Stay far away from these pretenders and parasites, and before you take "grandma" to the shrink because she's "losing her marbles", check to see what drugs her doctor has been pushing... ahh, I mean prescribing, for her. It might just be that the drugs are responsible for memory loss, confusion, dulled thinking, hallucinations, and a whole lot of other very undesirable things, including death.
These days psychiatrists are making out like bandits declaring seniors incapable and helping the government to take over their assets. These can be, and often are, the very same doctors who are prescribing these meds. They'll never even consider (or admit) that a drug's side effects could be causing the mental meltdown of a person. Beware.
Information is power they say. So before anyone of any age takes any drug that a doctor prescribes (or gives you from the samples from his/her desk drawer left by drug salespeople), educate yourself. Don't buy the pap being shoved at the public by govts or by the mainstream media, do some research yourself and use your noggin.
The best source of pharmaceutical drug side effects and warnings was established by Ralph Nader in the 1990s when Big Pharma began to swamp the marketplace with a plethora of new products:
www.worstpills.org
There is no better source of credible information about the risks of specific pharmaceutical drugs. This website has a gigantic database of every pharmaceutical drug. They also have an exemplary track record in calling for warnings and bans of dangerous drugs well in advance of FDA action.
They ask for a whopping $15 per year to subscribe for full services, the best investment I ever made, that dollar a month.
But even without being a subscriber, you can get a whole lot of very important, even life-saving information from www.worstpills.org Protect yourself from doctors, hospitals, nursing homes and Big Pharma. We're all at risk, in their hands.
Most people don't understand that psychiatry is not based on science but on theories that are never proven in any accepted scientific manner. Their theories cannot be proven in any literal way. It's all just in their heads. Seriously.
And in our twisted system of law (it's a 'lawyer system', not a legal system), psychiatrists are paid obscene sums to opine on anything without a single shred of evidence except "their opinion". They are hired guns for the law courts, and for the pharmaceutical companies, virtually all of them.
Stay far away from these pretenders and parasites, and before you take "grandma" to the shrink because she's "losing her marbles", check to see what drugs her doctor has been pushing... ahh, I mean prescribing, for her. It might just be that the drugs are responsible for memory loss, confusion, dulled thinking, hallucinations, and a whole lot of other very undesirable things, including death.
These days psychiatrists are making out like bandits declaring seniors incapable and helping the government to take over their assets. These can be, and often are, the very same doctors who are prescribing these meds. They'll never even consider (or admit) that a drug's side effects could be causing the mental meltdown of a person. Beware.
Information is power they say. So before anyone of any age takes any drug that a doctor prescribes (or gives you from the samples from his/her desk drawer left by drug salespeople), educate yourself. Don't buy the pap being shoved at the public by govts or by the mainstream media, do some research yourself and use your noggin.
The best source of pharmaceutical drug side effects and warnings was established by Ralph Nader in the 1990s when Big Pharma began to swamp the marketplace with a plethora of new products:
www.worstpills.org
There is no better source of credible information about the risks of specific pharmaceutical drugs. This website has a gigantic database of every pharmaceutical drug. They also have an exemplary track record in calling for warnings and bans of dangerous drugs well in advance of FDA action.
They ask for a whopping $15 per year to subscribe for full services, the best investment I ever made, that dollar a month.
But even without being a subscriber, you can get a whole lot of very important, even life-saving information from www.worstpills.org Protect yourself from doctors, hospitals, nursing homes and Big Pharma. We're all at risk, in their hands.
DRUNK PSYCHIATRY
The only people left on earth who think that drinking is still a good excuse for killing other human beings with a vehicle are called psychiatrists.
They are paid to enter courts of law and convince stupid and irresponsible judges that Mr. Drunk Killer has a sovereign right to remain at large amongst us.
How else are we to understand this latest local example of this endlessly repeated tragic and sickening scenario?
Chronic alcoholic nitwit drives his truck into a restaurant and kills two women.
Not one BUT TWO shrinks testify in court that the fool was not criminally responsible.
Why?
Cause the poor baby was suffering from alcoholic withdrawal, so he didn't really know which was was up.
Uh-huh.
He was put in custody for a short period and then released into the community.
I have said this before and I will say it again.
When this sick mother kills someone else, I want to see those two shrinks and the judge charged with criminal negligence and put in prison.
Of course, I am delusional and that will never happen and just because I even entertain such thoughts the court can clearly see that I am not responsible for my actions.
Saturday, January 21, 2012
AS GOOD AS IT GETS
The following was sent to me by a friend who knows the DTES better than most.. This is just about one of the best pieces on the subject I`ve ever read.
Think back about 10 years when Vancouver's injection drug users all got together and created a lobby group - VANDU ….and people thought they were nuts. They lobbied for drug users rights and eventually they got it from the local politicians. Guys like quiet uneventful Philp Owen woke up and thought they could be viewed as a visionary if they got on board. The druggies were able to convince the locals that instead of being called DRUG ABUSERS they should be called DRUG USERS and eventually their lifestyle was accepted and they were called THE DRUG COMMMUNITY. All the while without having any desire to kick the habit, pay their share of the taxes, and contribute to society like the rest of us. They were able to convince some of the locals that DRUG INTERVENTION and DRUG ABSTINENCE were mean, nasty, and unrealistic goals. They could now continue to live off the rest of society without any guilt.
And many left leaning people got good paying jobs in Vancouver to service the drug community's every need. Millions and millions of tax dollars poured into the area without anyone monitoring the results. Politicians pretended to base their entire political direction on helping the poor addicted people but never really did anything significant to change the situation. That way their political careers flourished. (Libby Davies, Jenny Kwan, Jim Green, Mayor Larry Campbell, Philip Owen, etc.etc.)
As long as there were plenty of drug addicts kept around they could all keep their jobs. So any time there is a hint of changing the status quo they all get back together and get up in arms.
The majority of the public cannot relate to someone who is addicted to drugs such as heroin, pot, and cocaine because they don't have addicted family members or friends on the stuff. They don't understand that a heroin or cocaine addiction which is an illegal substance is similar to a tobacco, prescription drug or alcohol addiction which is a legal substance. After all they are all similar drugs with similar effects. Some are injected. Some are smoked. Some are inhaled. And some are consumed. In order to kick the habit, on ANY OF THESE DRUGS, one does not have to be strapped down to a hospital bed for days on end monitored by medical staff like an Intensive Care Unit.
Drug treatment centres aren't fancy hospitals built like prisons watching the patients every move 24/7. Instead most drug treatment facilties are simply supportive housing where patients are free to come and go and where abstinence is preached along with group counselling. Nothing fancy. Nothing highly technical that requires a lengthy hospital visit. People can kick drug addictions in their own home.
The public can't really relate to a person addicted to illegal drugs but they can relate to someone with a tobacco, prescription drugs, or alcohol addiction because they are more likely to have family members or friends with these problems. They may even have this problem themselves.
Getting back to the story of the Free booze lounge in the skids…. Vancouver Alcoholics, with help from the poverty pimps, are trying to do what the drug users did a decade ago. They are organizing themselves and are demanding a steady stream of free booze everyday of the week. This is another new industry where many jobs could be created.
This time they are not getting the same look from the public. Many of us personally know people that have a problem with alcohol. We think that it is ridiculous to think that we would reward people like Uncle Harold and Cousin Fred with free booze when we know they are just lazy slobs that want to party all night and sleep all day.
If we do give free booze to these people what is going to guarentee they are not going to continue to supplement their drinking with the mouthwash, shaving cream etc. at night?
Also if we start feeding people free booze is the public legally responsible once they leave the facilty and begin to cross the street while intoxicated. What if they leave the facililty go lie down in the alley and freeze to death? Are we now going to have to hire personal escorts or chauffeurs to make sure they return to their one room apartment?
Instead of Community GARDENS Vancouver could have Community U-BREW sites all over the city to feed the alcoholics.
If this keeps up… instead of having to go to work everyday to pay the taxes… some of us could spend the time fermenting alcohol and growing pot for their own personal consumption while living off the public teet.
As it is right now each year our TAX FREEDOM DATE is in June or July. That means that half of all the money we make goes to paying taxes so that the rest of society can live.
Let's get realistic….We all can't sit around and wait for the welfare cheque to roll in each month.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
MARRIED IS MARRIED
When one of my closest friends married his same-sex partner of many years, I gave a little speech.
Among other things, I praised the extraordinary country I live in. It's still called Canada.
Now I don't like to be made a liar or a fool.
Least of all by some government legal mandarin bone-head with WAY TOO MUCH TIME ON HIS HANDS.
This clown belongs to that special class of bureaucrats we lovingly call The Meddlers.
When anything progressive or reasonable or simply good is running along just fine, thank you, one of these dingbats crawls out of the slime to raise some obscure objection found deep within article 11064-B rezi22M.
Put these men in little rooms out of harms way. Give them Lego sets and the Encyclopedia Britannica and send in food on occasion.
As for my gay married friends, fear not. This little tempest will soon crawl back into its tea pot and go to sleep until the next accidental outrage.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
ANOTHER COMMENT THAT CALLS FOR ITS OWN POST
The writer, Gerry Verrier, is the Program Director of Manitoba's Behavioural Health Foundation. Now in its 41st year, BHF, has 136 beds for men, women, children and families and turns out clean and sober citizens every day of the week.
David,
Where are the safe cigarette smoking sites?? You would think that if there was an addiction, and nicotine addiction is one of the if not the most debilitating addictions, that required interventions and programs for people to stop so as to save health dollars and protect children and others from dangerous second hand smoke, it would be nicotine addiction.
What really kicks me in the crotch over this issue is the tax dollars most cigarette smokers pay. In 2007, 63-79% of what smokers paid for a package of cigarettes went towards provincial and federal taxes. 63-79%, for pete's sakes! (http://www.cbc.ca/news/
And what do smokers get for their tax dollars? They are ostracized, they are forced to look at disgusting photos on their cigarette packages, they must hide in alleyways and laws have been created that prevent smokers from even smoking in their own cars should the cars contain minors. People complain about cigarette butts on the streets, but what about the chewing gum that literally coats sidewalks? I've seen the steam machines the city of Vancouver has out and about with the sole job of cleaning gum off sidewalks.
Smoking cigarettes is not illegal. Buying cigarettes is not illegal. Selling cigarettes is not illegal with the proper licenses (another form of taxation). But somehow smokers are stigmatized and there is a national taxpayer-funded campaign to stop people from smoking.
But hey if you use heroin, our society will provide you with nurses and doctors and places where you can freely use those illegal drugs. You will even get free drug injecting/smoking paraphernalia. If you're a drunk, they want to provide you with free booze. If you smoke crack cocaine, the most destructive drug to hit our communities, there are taxpayer-funded vans and nurses that will bring you free kits that will make it easier for you to smoke crack.
What taxes do crackheads and junkies pay? Why are tax-paying cigarette smokers treated like shit while thieving junkies are provided with everything to continue with their sorry existence?? Why not employ the same techniques used with cigarette smokers with junkies? Where's the national campaign to stomp out heroin and cocaine addiction?
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
It Gets Bettery Every Day
This just leaked by my friend, Victor.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Iconic Canadian company, Tim Hortons, has announced a program geared to fighting the obesity epidemic in Canada.
The company will establish "Safe Fat Rooms (SFRs)" at selective locations in Vancouver. At these SFRs, morbidly obese Canadians will be welcome to enter, pull up two or three chairs, depending on their condition, and indulge in an assortment of donuts from a perfectly clean plate.
Advisors will be on site (ONSITE) to refer SFR attendees to Steve Nash Fitness Centres. Proponents of this gut-wrenching initiative are confident that many users will actually wrench their guts from a chair and waddle over to see what a Steve Nash Centre looks like.
In a related announcement, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robinson has announced that "ultra-wide" bike lanes will be installed on Vancouver bridges to accommodate the "hugely"popular 3-wheel mammoth tricycles gaining favour among Vancouver's bulging population.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
