Saturday, February 9, 2013
One likes to think - naively, optimistically - that certain principles abide.
Democracy is about engagement. The more citizens are involved in their local communities, the healthier we all are. Neighborhood watch, block parties, community centres, volunteerism - these are among the many signs of a mindful local group who recognize both their privacy and their common ground.
But there are other principles at play.
And, as we always say in Journalism 101, "follow the money."
Local citizens have volunteered their time and energies for many yeras now to assure that yoga, language lessons, bridge games, tennis, and a score of other activities are available and affordable in their immediate neighborhoods.
It is the lively commitment of these exemplary involved citizens that make community centres tick.
Pathetic. Tragic. A direct hit to the heart of the democratic ideal.
When this story first surfaced, I asked myself once again (This question comes up about once every two years.), "Isn't the Park Board just a part of Vancouver City Government?"
It didn't take long for my old buddy, Allen Garr, to answer that question in the Courier.
And right smartly too.
The penny drops.
Is it time to phase out Vision's Penny?
More recently, on Tuesday evening while Green Party Coun. Adriane Carr was sitting in a public hearing at city hall regarding a contentious West End development, her cell phone rang. It was Ballem. Carr would get back to her at the next beak.
It turns out that on Monday, Carr, following city council procedure, filed a notice of motion to ask staff essentially this: given the park board's intention to take over the revenues of community centres which would most likely dampen future fundraising efforts by community center volunteer boards, what was the city's estimation of the funding shortfall this would create for the park board? And, given that the park board is a department of the city from whence it receives its budget, what contingency plan does the city have to make up for that funding shortfall?
A reasonable request based on a reasonable assumption, no?
But it's also reasonable to assume we will never find out. Because according to Carr what Ballem phoned to say was this: Carr's notice of motion would never see the light of day. Carr says she was told that her motion asking for information could jeopardize the "negotiations" now going on between the park board and the community centres.
When I emailed Ballem and asked about her extraordinary move to muzzle an elected representative, her communications machinery spit out an elaborate "no comment."
Incidentally, the public hearing Carr was sitting through Tuesday night under city hall rules ended at 11 p.m.. It would continue at a later date to hear the rest of the 50 or so speakers. (The rule says hearings must end at 10 p.m. but can, with a unanimous vote of council, be extended by one hour.)
Nothing so civilized was contemplated across town the night before. That's when 74 people lined up to speak in a packed room at the West End Community Centre. This was at an "emergency meeting" called for by what is an increasingly inept and disrespectful park board to hear from the public on the board's plan to have their way with community centre funds. For decades, these funds had been left in the hands of volunteer boards to be used for everything from renovations to the creation of new facilities. That was ending.
The approximately 30 pages of material for the meeting was not available until 11 that morning, which meant that most board members who work for a living didn't see it until an hour or so before the meeting started.
As you may already know, the meeting started at 6:30 p.m. and clattered on for nine hours, which made it 3:30 in the morning with members of the dwindling audience repeatedly asking for an adjournment only to be rebuffed.
It finally reached a sorry state of frustration because of the lateness of the hour and the vast majority of the speakers opposing what the park board was up to, frequently pointing out significant errors in the material being presented. I was long gone by the time the Vision majority blithely passed the motions to support what they had intended to do all along and cops had to be called in to restrain those who were left.
This passes for what Vision Vancouver calls citizen engagement.
© Copyright (c) Vancouver Courier
* * *
This morning, The Sun advises us that City Councillor Adrian Carr has had to hire a lawyer to get simple financial information from her own - our own - government.
Ballem has been a tyrannical autocrat of the worst order from Day One. It is only slightly amusing that such a happy feel-good biking, goat-feeding council should need Axe Lady in their corner. Good cop, bad cop redux.
Let's get a new City manager and let's leave the good folks to run their own pre-natal classes, shall we?
Posted by David Berner at 10:58 AM