"South Asians" apparently hold all keys to democracy in British Columbia.
South Asians is codeword for Indian and Pakistani, as far as I can understand this term when used in the context of voting and elections.
Three years ago in a public forum, I dared to question the decency and usefulness of busing in hundreds of elderly new immigrants who didn't speak English or French, who had no idea of local history and who knew nothing of the candidates on the ballots. These people cast votes. Their votes were decisive in election results.
The words were barely out of my mouth when Kerry Jang, then a Vision slate candidate for Vancouver City Council, and now a Vision slate Vancouver City Councillor, leapt to his feet enraged.
Of course, he accused me of racism, among other crimes.
After the public debate, Jang stood in front of me and glared.
When I asked him what he wanted, he hissed, "I know you!"
I assured him he knew nothing about me, and ended with the ever graceful, "F--- off!"
Interesting, therefore, to read the morning headline:
B.C. Liberal, NDP leadership races saw same people sign up for both partiesfollowed by this:
"Several hundred Surrey residents held dual memberships in the B.C. Liberal Party and provincial NDP when both parties were holding their leadership campaigns earlier this year.
It was well known that organizers for candidates in both parties were aggressively signing up South Asians in Surrey during the leadership contests..."
So, your Mr. Gill and my Mr. Gill loves both political parties equally.
Isn't that nice?
Isn't that exactly what we want all Canadians to understand about political process?
Isn't that what we teach in civics class?
Oh, I forgot.
We don't teach civics class.
Only in Canada, you say?