Friday, June 27, 2008

FRIDAY PROVINCE COLUMN

It's time to free our roads from the dangers of drugged driving
David Berner
The Province

Driving while stoned on drugs is going out of fashion.

Just after Canada Day, police across the country will be empowered to pull you over and question your clear-headedness. If you don't agree to a roadside test, like walking a straight line, you may be required to go to a police station and possibly have to donate a blood, urine or saliva sample.

As soon as this new federal legislation came to light all the usual suspects raised the familiar hullabaloo about privacy and civil rights.

There are kinks to be worked out, no doubt. But the bottom line here is that anything that helps reduce our senseless road carnage should be welcomed.

Remember it was not politicians, but citizen groups like MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) and SADD (originally Students Against Driving Drunk, and now,

Students Against Destructive Decisions) who, through relentless lobbying, changed the laws and public perception. Before these pioneers, we all winked at the dimwit who downed fists full of martinis after work and hopped in the Chevy to drive home.

Don't you recognize how much our attitudes have changed?

Now we need one more shift -- tackling the problem of motorists driving under the influence of prescription drugs.

I don't have the figures to prove it, but I reckon at least half the people driving while impaired by chemicals are doing so with the aid of their friendly neighbourhood doctor, psychiatrist or pharmacist.

Prozac and Ritalin, for example, are among the world's most widely prescribed "medicines." Then there's diazepam, amitriptyline, chlorpromazine and a thousand psychotropic drugs found in the alphabet soup of modern pharmacology.

Google any one of these modern miracle workers and you will find pages of helpful descriptions and analyses.

In almost every case, in the tiniest print on the second or third page, you will find this modest instruction: "Use caution when driving or operating machinery."

This, of course, is after the customary warnings about possible side-effects like nausea, headaches, dizziness, drowsiness and fainting.

But the last time your doctor prescribed a little blue or pink "helper" to get you through the travails of life, did he or she happen to mention that maybe driving under their influence wasn't the best idea?

Does anyone remember the last time the B.C. Medical Association or the Canadian Psychiatric Association ran a public-information forum on the problems and responsibilities involved in taking powerful mood-changing chemicals and driving the Ford Exploder? Probably not.

The death and destruction on our roads is due to speed, alcohol, illegal drugs -- and both prescription and over-the-counter medicines.

It is time for each of us, as responsible patients, consumers and citizens, to be aware of the dangers involved. And it is time for the professionals to show the same care and concern.

david@davidberner.com

© The Vancouver Province 2008

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

While I am not a fan of psychiatry or psych drugs - quite the opposite - all possible side effects of any medication do not happen to *all* people (**see below) Many people can and do take anti depressants, such as Prozac and experience no dizzy/drowsy side effects. If a pharmaceutical manufacturer determines that only *one* person has become dizzy/drowsy, etc. when taking the medication, they *must* list that as a side effect. This is a very complicated matter. There are many prescription drugs which are not psych meds which contain the "driving if drowsy" caution.
I know how you feel about psychiatrists, psychiatry and psych meds David and I share many of your views and opinions, however diligence is required if and when this matter is looked into when it comes to operating a motor vehicle, as well as other tasks one is required to perform - on the job, etc.

"**Prozac - (fluoxetine)
Drowsiness/reduced alertness: People taking fluoxetine are cautioned against driving a car or performing hazardous tasks until they determine that this medication does not affect them adversely."