Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Cheques & (Bank) Balances


There is a disturbing trend in editorial writing these days.


This morning, The Vancouver Sun has published yet another piece decrying public disagreement with official policy. A consistent pattern has emerged in recent months in which the city's largest daily journal objects to debate or opposing opinions, favoring in each case, the status quo.


Today they say ,"Critique of Olympic Planning is Redundant and Wasteful."


And they may be right about the way this study was funded and other particulars. But isn't this the core of democratic process - checks and balances?


So a group was gifted $109,000 to rate VANOC's performance?


When VANOC is shrouded in secrecy and spending is astronomical and historical precedent tells us that Olympic Games are often in the red, why not ask questions?


The Fifth Estate can do better.


No comments: