Courier's Mark Hsiuk's Excellent Piece on Mayors and Insite
Mr.Robertson's neighbourhood
Future bleak for Mr. Robertson's  neighbourhood
Published in the Vancouver  Courier: Monday, Nov.10.
This weekend Vancouverites head to the polls to choose our next mayor. On most issues, both candidates-NPA Coun. Peter Ladner and Vision Vancouver hopeful Gregor Robertson-sing off the same song sheet.
But what about the Downtown Eastside?  Our city's ugly blight. Our six blocks of shame. Our little election's Iraq  war.
Both candidates promise to clean up  the neighbourhood in time for the 2010 Olympics. Yet both cling to former NPA  mayor Philip Owen's Four Pillars drug strategy, which relies heavily on  so-called "harm reduction" to combat addiction and crime. And both believe in  the Insite supervised injection site, harm reduction's shining obelisk at 139  East Hastings.
However, Ladner says "no"  to more injection sites. One is enough. The Insite model, he says, should not be  exported to other areas of the city. But Robertson wants more. He envisions a  city teeming with Insites. He supports erecting similar models in  yet-to-be-named neighbourhoods, so junkies from Point Grey to Hastings/Sunrise  need not travel far for their fix. Possible Robertson campaign slogan: "No fun  city? Not for long." 
Additionally,  during the Courier's mayoral debate in October, Robertson failed to pooh-pooh  former COPE Mayor Larry Campbell's idea of a government-funded crack house,  where addicts inhale a soul-crushing toxin as nurses hand out shiny new crack  pipes to the living dead.
Possible  Robertson campaign slogan No. 2. "Team Robertson: we'll try anything  once."
Robertson also wants to establish  a "roundtable on prostitution," and said he was "not in favour of legalized  brothels, at this time." 
At this time.  Right. How about after you get elected? How about after your roundtable, packed  with harm reduction aficionados, calls for indoor "work sites" and a red light  district? 
Possible Robertson campaign  slogan No. 3. "Vote Robertson: they love him in Amsterdam." Simply put,  Robertson doesn't get it. The Downtown Eastside requires a cultural revolution,  not more government enabling. The seven years since Owen ushered in his Four  Pillars strategy have been a disaster. By all accounts, things get worse every  day. The open drug market thrives. Chinatown is under siege. Homelessness has  doubled, a trend owed not only to a lack of housing but to the Downtown  Eastside's courtship of drug users.
Which leads back to Insite. Most Insite users typically  shoot up elsewhere at some point during the day. And Insite accounts for less  than five per cent of all injections in the neighbourhood. Still, proponents  claim Insite reduces overdoses, needle sharing and public injections. But they  don't consider the cultural consequences. 
Why do people come to the Downtown Eastside? Because  that's where the drugs are. Insite removes yet another impediment for drug abuse  and surrenders the moral ground to drug dealers. Insite perpetuates a culture of  drugs and excess-the two staples of addiction. And as with B.C.'s reckless  methadone maintenance program, Insite offers no mandatory treatment. For every  heroin addict Insite "helps," countless others are spawned in the dreary  environment Insite helps create. 
And  Robertson wants more. Perhaps he's listened to vocal members of B.C.'s medical  community-a viper's nest of harm reduction PhDs. Folks like Dr. Julio Montaner,  head of the B.C. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, the "independent third party  research and evaluation" organization charged with justifying Insite's  existence. Or UBC's Dr. John Hepburn, who helped pen a scolding letter to Prime  Minister Stephen Harper in 2007 after the Conservatives dared question Insite's  effectiveness. Hepburn frequently cites the "best interests of patients" in his  Insite defense--a revealing statement that embodies the narrow thinking of harm  reduction fanatics. 
Note to Dr.  Hepburn: the Downtown Eastside is not your office waiting room, where patients  thumb through back issues of People magazine while waiting for prescriptions.  Policies administered in Insite's sterile confines have wide-reaching  ramifications that can't be discovered in a UBC laboratory. The neighbourhood is  rotting, and we'll never keep up with the destructive results of wanton drug  abuse if drug abuse is part of the solution. 
So when you hit the polls this Saturday, cast your vote  carefully. The fate of many addicted and mentally ill people may hang in the  balance. An expansion of harm reduction will expand the Downtown Eastside. Like  Obama says, it's time for "Change We Need." Nobody needs more "harm reduction"  help from city hall. 
Or more  accurately, nobody deserves that.



2 comments:
Mair's axion #1 - you don't have to be a 10 to win in politics; you need only be a 3 if your competition is a 1.
Grumpy's observation on
Mair's axiom #1; if everyone is a "0", book tickets on the Titanic.
I am against insite but for moving car lanes on the Burrard Bridge to bikes.
What to do?
Post a Comment