The news that a museum in sunny downtown enlightened Prince Rupert has barred an American visitor and his motorized wheelchair is way beyond appalling.
The museum has its excuses and reasons and they are all shoddy beyond understanding.
Please tell me these ghouls will be fired.
Please let us citizens of BC fly this fellow back and give him a personal tour of the museum and fotos of the previous administration in jail or living on the streets.
"You have feces and urine and blood on walls, you have garbage that piles up, you have mattresses, people are living there," said Greater Victoria board of education trustee Peg Orcherton.She said discarded needles at Victoria high school are also a big concern. Orcherton said the problem has existed since she was first elected six years ago, but was never as bad as it is now."
Story about Victoria schools in this morning's Sun.
The raging success of Harm Seduction continues at a steady pace.
George Abbott's protestations to the contrary, however, I read the proposal differently. I think it was a back-handed attempt by the Liberals to take doctors' visits off the healthcare system and load the fee on at the drug store.
The Minister says not, but drug stores are not into losing money. So if Abbott is successful in squashing the fee, the pharmacy will just build the cost into the price of the prescription.
I support doctors on this, and here's why...
The current system, as you point out, requires a patient to visit the doctor to have a prescription renewed beyond the number of repeats indicated on the first label. A costly, unnecessary nuisance? Maybe - but only if an innocuous med is being prescribed.
For anything more, the BCMA has a valid point - even if it does provide income for the prescribing physician.
Today's medications are hi-tech stuff. Almost daily, we hear of newly-discovered, sometimes life-threatening side effects of meds that have been on the market for years. In some cases, that unnecessary visit to the doctor can save your life...
Conflicts with diet or other meds; doubling-up by patient visits to more than one pharmacy; undesired side-effects, drugs not achieving the relief for which they were prescribed, embarrassing results a patient will not discuss in a busy drug store. There are endless reasons why that doctor's visit would be a better way to go.
All of that said, there's a far more important aspect to the Pharmacare problem that is never really thrashed out...
IF GOVERNMENTS WANT TO SAVE MONEY IN THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, WHY ARE THEY SO UNWILLING TO TACKLE THE CORE PROBLEM - THE COST OF THE DRUGS IMPOSED BY THE MACHINATIONS OF THE MANUFACTURERS AT THE TOP OF THE CHAIN? To illustrate...
Following a bout of food-poisoning about five years ago, a patient was left with a chronic case of gastro-esophageal reflux - GERD. Left untreated, a GERD patient is not only very uncomfortable, the condition can lead to cancer.
The modern, very expensive, blitz-advertised remedy is what, for legal reasons, I'll call the sexy-pill. The sexy-pill was initially prescribed to our patient.
It did not effect a cure within the "usual" eight weeks. A visit to the doctor suggested other, less expensive, options. The patient demurred, reluctant to change from said sexy-pill, which had given great relief, despite no cure.
Incredibly, the doctor explained thusly: "This alternative, in all ways that matter, has the same ingredients. What you need to know is that the manufacturer of the sexy-pill initially produced a similar med, same medicinal ingredients...but the patent-protection period was coming to an end. Had that happened, any company would have been free to produce it, and the price would have dropped dramatically. So the manufacturer added a few mean-nothing ingredients, changed its appearance, re-patented it for another ten years, and Presto! the sexy-pill was born. And it is now sold at an even higher price."
When our patient expressed surprise and disgust, the doctor replied, "It happens all the time -all throughout the pharmaceutical industry, and the legal rights of the patent are costing us bigtime. How else do you think they can afford to give me this box of sexy-pill samples."
When I heard about this, David, I began to do some research which, sadly became overwhelmed by other projects. Suffice it to say - other countries, many of them poor countries, have found ways to combat this...ways that, if duplicated in North America, would save patients and governments alike BILLIONS of dollars.
Likely to happen? Don't hold your breath.
Liz J.
September 19, 2008
[Photo] Pharmacists will now be able to renew prescriptions without your visit to the family doctor.
Clearly this means the world is coming to an end.
At least, that's what it means if you are the BC Medical Association, to whit, a doctor.
Raise the drawbridge! Alert the crocs! The peasants are revolting!
posted by David Berner at 10:22 AM on Sep 18, 2008
The man says on the radio that the police make too many mistakes.
He says this, of course, in a knee-jerk defense of the courts.
It is no accident that most of the citizens of this sovereign state have lost all confidence in our courts.
Today, three cases illustrate.
In two of the, Hell's Angels have been acquitted of various criminal charges. Oops.
In another, a man fired eight shots at his mother, striking her with three, killed her, then buried her in the woods nearby.
Sentence? Four years.
So, in a time when the police need more support, not less, our top cop babbles shamelessly on the airwaves that the police make too many mistakes.
No doubt the police, like you and me, make their share of mistakes.
No doubt their mistakes are costlier than most of our failures to put the top back on the marmalade jar.
But their mistakes pale to insignificance compared to the atrocities doled out by our courts on a daily basis. Criminal justice is but a ghost in this town these days and most of us feel it viscerally.
The wedding pictures of actor George Takei and his partner that flashed around the world the other day got me thinking.
And not in the right direction.
Takei played Sulu on Star Trek for 947 light years, or thereabouts.
My first concern was all those Trekkies.
Many of them will be happy for their Sulu Man, of course.
But equally many will probably foresake their protein shakes for several days in mourning.
Willing and able to accept the most fanciful notions - people with pizza faces, William Shatner is a great actor, a guy with pointy ears and no emotions could be anything other than president of the United States for eight years - these same loyals will struggle with the idea that one of their favorites wants to snuggle with a similarly gendered humanoid.
Yikes!
Then my thoughts - if you can call these thoughts, more like LED blinks on a mottled wallboard - wandered to that lovely gal who has replaced Branjolina as The Headliner. You know, the one who knows everything about Russia because she can see it from her front porch.
Her defenders ( a nation unto itself, Palinistan) will be quick to tell you that she is not against gays. Or at least, not too close to them. That she thinks gays should have all the usual equal rights. Just that "marriage" is a word, apparently so holy, so suffused with godliness that it cannot be squandered on any other than a righteous man and a righteous woman.
First and last is the word, don't you know?
So I'm looking at these pics of George and Brad and I'm wondering once again how the marriage of these two souls can in one catclysmic moment upset all that has come before and all that will follow.
How many millions of men and women have married and will marry? But two guys in California dare to marry and the world is coming to an end.
The tolerance and acceptance and love that comes with these holy vows has gone where?
Closer to home, we learn today that abortion and gay marriage are still issues in the upcoming federal election.
We are on the precipice of a total world economic collapse and there are people still kvetching about abortion and gay marriage.
The real story is that the West Vancouver school system is so hide-bound and frozen that it can't handle 2 more students who would like to walk to school.
The headline plays unnecessarily into the hands of anti-immigration folk, who wait, drooling, just for moments like this to emerge from their bunkers.
The Age ~~ Melbourne ~~ Wednesday, September 17, 2008 Welcome to this year's blockbuster
By Catherine Deveny
I'M OBSESSED with Sarah Palin. She's the first thing I think about when I wake and the last thing I think of before I go to sleep. I google her a dozen times a day and manage to bring her up in every conversation I have.
"You have hair. Sarah Palin has hair. What a coincidence! She has big hair and it's brown. Her kids have hair too. Their names are Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper and Trig. Would you like to see a photo of Sarah's hair? Or her kids' hair? Or her husband the First Dude's hair? She's a great mother, she went back to work three days after giving birth to a disabled child. Of course, she didn't have to. She chose to. She and the First Dude had little Trig's best interests at heart. Never too early to instil independence. It toughens 'em up. Next stop? A bloody good war."
I found myself checking out Palin Facebook groups last night. The ones that amused me included: Excuse Me, But Has Anyone Else Noticed That Sarah Palin Is Insane? My Dog Is More Qualified To Be Vice-President Than Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin Is A Bona Fide Whack Job. Librarians Against Sarah Palin. I Would Have Sex With, But Not Vote For, Sarah Palin. And: I Would Rather Have A Mentally Challenged Goat As VP Than Sarah Palin.
I'd been thinking the US election campaign was dragging on endlessly until I read the headline "McCain chooses woman for running mate." I loved that, "woman". Sums the whole thing up. She's the closest thing Republican strategists could find to a man with a vagina. No political party in the world would have had the genius to dream up Sarah Palin. She's a social experiment with lipstick.
New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd likened the Sarah Palin story to the chick flick Miss Congeniality. I think of it more as an in-flight movie. Like Dumb and Dumber. If you're after a laugh, check out the campaign poster for McCain and Palin. The slogan is "The Ticket For America". The running mates look like an old rich bloke with erectile dysfunction and his white trash trophy wife wearing glasses so she looks intellectual and that.
McCain strikes me as "a bit of a fall" away from stewed prunes and dribbling, and she looks as hungry and deranged as Anna Nicole Smith. "Hey, Johnny, why don't y'all take up smoking! It's not too late. Have another spoon of cholesterol. Where's that special button you done talked about that blows up countries? Bristol's boyfriend's Xbox isn't working and he's bored."
I'm not proud of it but to be honest, the comedy writer in me really, really hopes Palin gets in. Shooting, hunting, God-fearing, anti-abortion, book-banning, homophobic, white trash moron. I'd love to see the White House lawn covered in cars up on blocks. Male, female, goat or goldfish, Palin is a writer's dream. I wish I had the imagination to invent her.
And the hits just keep on coming. Each day there's another titbit that draws me in. "She what? Not only believes that abstinence should be the only form of contraception taught in schools and she slashed funding to a program for teenage mothers but she charged victims of sexual assault for their own rape kits. I don't even know what rape kits are but I sure as hell know you don't charge people for them." And how does that whole guns and God thing work? "Say a prayer and the merciful Lord will protect us. And if he doesn't, pass me the Uzi."
The only problem with Sarah Palin is that she's real. And, like it or not, she'll be used as an example of a female politician. Regardless of the fact she should be filed under dangerous white trash fuelled by fear, propelled by power and supported by halfwits.
I have two long-held beliefs. First, people should have to pass an intelligence test before they're allowed to vote and second, that the rest of the world should be able to vote in the US elections because the outcome affects us as much as them. If not more.
Like most people, I believe in democracy. As long as everybody else votes the same way I do. The problems with democracy are that a) not everyone makes an informed choice and b) if they do, what informs that choice. We're at the mercy of the morons. People who vote for race, gender, class and politicians who massage people's prejudices and reinforce beliefs fertilised by fear.
Sarah Palin personifies the cockiness of ignorance. Bertrand Russell said: "Fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Pass me the popcorn, I can't wait to see how this movie ends.
1. Clarence Hansen, chairman of the (Do We really Need This Body?) Board of Education, says that politics played no factor in choosing school upgrades in Campbell's riding.
Whose cousin is this clown?
Running off at the mouth is allowed; but babbling incomprehensibly and lying through your teeth is unseemly for a guy in a nice suit.
2. The Board of Trade - THE BOARD OF FREAKING TRADE, FOR GWADSAKES - has declared the Preem's Carbon Tax a no-go.
Campbell is the Board of Trade. The Board is the Liberal government. These folks are Siamese twins.
This is like having your mom not applaud wildly when you recite the poem at the Christmas concert.
3. Vaughn Palmer lists the 900 reasons that cancelling the fall sitting of the legislature has rightfully infuriated citizens and lovers of the democratic process everywhere.
Can you say, "Stayed too long at the fair," boys and girls?
Today's Letter to the Editor from Dr. Stan De Vlaming and 23 of his medical friends demonstrates a) how myths are created and b) why we are in such a mess regarding drugs.
Here is the key statement in their letter:
"Methadone mainenance is a valuable tool for the treatment of addiction and is supported by 50 years of experience and research."
Methadone maintenanc is in fact an unmitigated disaster, a dreadful waste of public funds and a declaration of hoplessness. "You cannot walk free of your addiction, so take this, you poor fool."
What cynicism.
What lack of kindness and courage.
What Dr. De Vlaming and his colleagues are well-respected doctors.
They are, as Marc Antony said of Brutus and Cassius, honorable men all.
David, I have to agree with you comments on home care.
Although I have worked as an LPN in a long term care facility for over ten years, I started out working for a home care agency in 1997.
When I started with this work, I was classified as a "Home Support Worker II" (I was not working as an LPN). I assisted people in their homes with washing, dressing, bathing, cooking, cleaning, errands, companionship and the like). I enjoyed working with people in their homes.
I was paid $13.30 per hour (IN 1997!!!). The rate for these workers has not increased much (if at all). This wage did not include time to travel between clients homes. In others words, I might be booked for two hours in one home, and then have to take a bus for 1/2 hour to get to another job - I was not paid for that 1/2 hour - ONLY the time that I was caring for someone in their home.
I remember getting a call from the scheduler asking if I could drive from my family home in East Vancouver to a client in South Tsawassen for a two hour job. They wanted me in the middle of the weekday rush hour. I politely explained that I could not justify spending over an hour to commute to a two hour job (and then have to drive home) (Incidentally, I was not going to be reimbursed for the use of my car either..). Later, I accepted a job in facility (very hard work, but rewarding personally/professionaly and with fair compensation
You better believe it costs money for good home care. I really admire the people who continue to care for people in their homes. They are doing a great job and they certainly are not being fairly compensated for all that they give.
Oh, and while I am ranting away....it's all well and good that we want to encourage people to stay in their homes - but just look at the hullaballu that occured when that 90+ woman simply wanted a ramp put into her building (where she had been living for 30 years!!).
All the new townhomes that are being built have steps and tiny washrooms - not exactly condusive for people in a wheelchair requiring assistance!!
Hot damn - I think I will just continue. What EXACTLY do they mean by "age friendly communities"??? Would this be more 55+ housing so we can keep our elders completely separated from their families and any community support. How about make the existing housing accessible and encouraging inclusive communities to begin with!!
Supporting volunteerism?? Who the heck doesn't support volunteerism where and when appropriate?? Check out Volunteer Vancouver, Check out the classifieds in the Employment Paper!! Lots of need for good volunteers!!
ARrggghhhh
You want to support seniors - stop delisting needing medications from Pharmacare!
You want to support seniors - every new development must be wheelchair accessible and every new unit must be wheelchair accessible.
You want to support seniors - better fund long term care facilities, provide funding for extra in home care where needed (and pay fair wages to home care workers so that the best and most suitable applicants will take on this work).
You want to support seniors - provide tax relief for seniors who are retired and unable to work so that their pensions and savings are not eaten away by inflation.
Finally, if you want to support seniors - for those elders who eventually have continuing and complex care needs who require placement in a skilled nursing facility - try to have an ounce of compassion and allow the placements to be made based (at least partially) on geography. There is nothing like an elderly couple being torn apart when one needs placement - only to have the placement be 30 kms away and impossible to access by public transit.
The Sarah Palin competence controversy provides an exiting opportunity for Canadians to examine the role that competence plays in the selection of Cabinet Ministers in this country.
Those with a minimal knowledge of Canadian politics understand that there are four criteria for selecting Cabinet Ministers. These are:
Region, plurality, gender and ethnicity. Competence for the Cabinet portfolio, which is an executive portfolio often involving billions in spending authority, is an unintended and rare consequence of this process.
Before briefly explaining how these four selection criteria are applied for selecting Cabinet Ministers, we should acknowledge that competence is not always a leading factor in selecting a Prime Minister.
Look at Pierre Trudeau. When he became PM at age 48 he had 3 years of political experience. Prior to that he lectured briefly and edited an obscure policy pamphlet in Quebec. As for his foreign affairs experience, it consisted of backpacking around the world well into his 30's, an age when the rest of us had a job. He famously wore a Nazi helmut during WW2 and fawned over Castro and Mao. We should brag.
In terms of the criteria for selecting a Cabinet, it works as follows.
In Cabinet selections, a PM needs regional balance and plurality means that a dummy from a big constituency gets the nod over a Rhodes scholar from a small one. Gender selection and Ethnicity require no elaboration.
Let's look at the results of this process.
Region: How about Max Bernier, the biker chick boinker from Quebec elevated to international relations.
Gender. Can you say Hedi Frye?
Ethnicity: Dosanjh can glide from party to party assured of a Cabinet post. Ditto Raymond Chan, another Mensa luminary
As for plurality being a determinant, it's hard to top the career of Sheila Copps.
Ms. Copps did nothing before entering politics other than have the good fortune of being sired by a popular Mayor of Hamilton. She made her name in Opposition as a member of the so-called Rat pack. Her most famous exploit in that phase of her career, proudly described in her biography, consisted of crawling in fury across a finance committee table to intimidate John Crosbie. If I saw Ms. Copps massive butt crawling at speed in my direction, I too would be intimidated.
She became Deputy Prime Minister. The PM in this country has far more executive powers than the President of the United States. Scampering Sheila was a heartbeat away from the job.
Another member of the Rat Pack was Brian Tobin, later touted by many as a Prime Minister in waiting. Prior to being elected at 24, he spent 2 years as a disc jockey at a 5000 watt radio station. I'm impressed.
So while Canadians smugly sniff around the competence issue in other countries, we maintain a blissful or willful ignorance about how we elevate people to powerful Cabinet posts here at home.
Maybe with two elections in the next 7 months, it would be a good time to start. But we won't .